Why Maine v. Boyd Is Not a Game-Changer

Posted by William Bly | Mar 10, 2017 | 0 Comments

In our last blog post, we discussed a new case from the Maine Supreme Court dealing with operating under the influence (OUI). While that case, Maine v. Boyd, might seem like it makes a huge difference in how police can gather evidence of drunk driving, the reality is far more muted. Because the only changes that it makes are within police control, you probably won't notice any changes at all if you get pulled over for OUI in Maine.

Case Changes How to Consent to a Blood Test

The case was handed down on March 2, 2017, and changes what police have to do if they want to get consent to conduct a blood test to determine your blood alcohol content (BAC).

In the case, Robert Boyd was arrested for OUI and brought to the police station for further testing. After problems with the breath test machine at the station, the arresting officer found a paramedic to perform a blood test, instead. However, the officer never asked Mr. Boyd for consent to take a blood sample, and while Mr. Boyd didn't object to the blood test, he also didn't affirmatively allow it, either.

That lack of affirmative consent was what made the Maine Supreme Court side with Mr. Boyd. Because it's the prosecutor who has the burden of proving that someone broke the law beyond a reasonable doubt, it was the prosecutor in the case who had to show that Mr. Boyd “consented” to the blood test. Therefore, even though Mr. Boyd cooperated with the police and the paramedic during the blood draw, because prosecutors couldn't point to a particular sign of his actual consent to the test, the evidence was thrown away.

Why This Case is Not a Game-Changer

This might seem like it should be a game-changer. It might seem like you can now just stay quiet when asked to take a BAC test.

Unfortunately, all that this is going to change is how police interact with you during the investigation process. They're going to make absolutely sure that they have an objectively clear manifestation of your consent to a test before they do it. So, instead of now being able to just remain silent when asked for consent to do a BAC test, that's the exact thing that you're not going to be able to do, now that this case is on the books – police will not take nothing as an answer.

Maine OUI-Defense Attorney William T. Bly

Developments like these, even if they don't drastically change how OUI investigations happen, are what OUI-defense attorney William T. Bly keeps an eye on. By staying up to date on all of the new developments in the field, Mr. Bly has established himself as a solid OUI-defense and criminal defense attorney in the state of Maine.

If you've been arrested and charged for OUI, contact his law office online or at (207) 571-8146 for the legal help you need.

About the Author

William Bly

William T. Bly, Esq. is a graduate of Rutgers College where he majored in Political Science with a minor in U.S. History. Attorney Bly attended and graduated the University of Maine School of Law. During his time in law school, Attorney Bly focused on criminal defense.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

WTB Law

Here at WTB Law, we provide professional and aggressive criminal defense representation that exceeds the expectations of our clients and secures their freedom and their future.

Contact Us Today

What distinguishes our firm from the numerous law firms throughout the state is that we genuinely care about the well-being of our clients. Because Attorney Bly is a sole practitioner, every client receives hands-on and personalized attention from Attorney Bly and our staff throughout the entirety of their case.

50 Adams Street
Biddeford, ME 04005
(207) 571-8146
Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri: 08:00am - 05:00pm

Menu